Claim of McNeil v. Orchard Lake Lodge

51 A.D.2d 1076, 381 N.Y.S.2d 143, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11915

This text of 51 A.D.2d 1076 (Claim of McNeil v. Orchard Lake Lodge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of McNeil v. Orchard Lake Lodge, 51 A.D.2d 1076, 381 N.Y.S.2d 143, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11915 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed February 14, 1974. Claimant’s deceased husband sustained a severe work-related head injury on May 9, 1967 necessitating three separate surgical procedures involving the brain and skull. He died on April 11, 1969 in a hospital emergency room as a result of an epileptic seizure. He suffered from these seizures intermittently after the injury of May 9, 1967, but it [1077]*1077also appears that he had sustained a concussion of the brain in a 1960 automobile accident which produced similar epileptic occurrences. The sole question on this appeal is whether substantial evidence supports the board’s finding of death causally related to the accidental injury of May 9, 1967. This, in turn, depends upon a factual determination of whether the seizures subsequent to May 9, 1967 were more frequent than those before that date because all medical witnesses indicated that resolution of that question would be determinative of the causal nexus, if any, between death and the work-related accident. While the issue is close, an examination of the autopsy report, the testimony of decedent at hearings prior to his death, and the report of the board physician, when coupled with evidence culled from the testimony of other medical witnesses, provides the necessary quantum of proof (Matter of Zaepfel v du Pont de Nemours & Co., 284 App Div 693, affd 309 NY 962). Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Koreman, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Kane and Mahoney, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Claim of Zaepfel v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.
284 A.D. 693 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1954)
Claim of Zaepfel v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co.
132 N.E.2d 327 (New York Court of Appeals, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 A.D.2d 1076, 381 N.Y.S.2d 143, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-mcneil-v-orchard-lake-lodge-nyappdiv-1976.