Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Claim of McCullom v. Rickborn & Myers

Claim of McCullom v. Rickborn & Myers

235 A.D. 645
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1932·Published

Opinion

Award reversed and claim dismissed, with costs against the State Industrial Board, on the ground that the deceased employee did not suffer an accidental injury, and on the authority of Jeffreyes v. Sager Co. (198 App. Div. 446; affd., 233 N. Y. 535); Matter of Lerner v. Rump Bros. (241 id. 153); Rosenthal v. National Aniline & Chemical Co. (216 App. Div. 588); O’Connell v. Adirondack Electric Power Corp. (193 id. 582, 585). All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claim of McCullom v. Rickborn & Myers, 235 A.D. 645 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

235 A.D. 645 (Claim of McCullom v. Rickborn & Myers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Jeffreyes v. . Charles H. Sager Company
135 N.E. 907 (New York Court of Appeals, 1922)
Claim of Jeffreyes v. Charles H. Sager Co.
198 A.D. 446 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1921)
Rosenthal v. National Aniline & Chemical Co.
216 A.D. 588 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1926)