Claim of McCullom v. Rickborn & Myers

235 A.D. 645

This text of 235 A.D. 645 (Claim of McCullom v. Rickborn & Myers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of McCullom v. Rickborn & Myers, 235 A.D. 645 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

Award reversed and claim dismissed, with costs against the State Industrial Board, on the ground that the deceased employee did not suffer an accidental injury, and on the authority of Jeffreyes v. Sager Co. (198 App. Div. 446; affd., 233 N. Y. 535); Matter of Lerner v. Rump Bros. (241 id. 153); Rosenthal v. National Aniline & Chemical Co. (216 App. Div. 588); O’Connell v. Adirondack Electric Power Corp. (193 id. 582, 585). All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Jeffreyes v. . Charles H. Sager Company
135 N.E. 907 (New York Court of Appeals, 1922)
Claim of Jeffreyes v. Charles H. Sager Co.
198 A.D. 446 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1921)
Rosenthal v. National Aniline & Chemical Co.
216 A.D. 588 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
235 A.D. 645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-mccullom-v-rickborn-myers-nyappdiv-1932.