Claim of Mc Coy v. Perlite Concrete Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Mc Coy v. Perlite Concrete Co.

54 A.D.2d 770, 387 N.Y.S.2d 176, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14447

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 1, 1976

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 54 A.D.2d 770 (Claim of Mc Coy v. Perlite Concrete Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Mc Coy v. Perlite Concrete Co., 54 A.D.2d 770, 387 N.Y.S.2d 176, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14447 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by respondent Special Fund for reargument and for review of taxation of costs on the appeal pursuant to CPLR 8404, denied, without costs. Although denying review of the taxation of costs in this case, the court notes that the printed record contains material which, although included in the board’s full record list, is irrelevant to the issues raised on the appeal. We disapprove of this practice and call attention to the board’s rule for shortening the record list (12 NYCRR 300.18) and to our new rule which directs that workmen’s compensation appeals shall be heard upon one copy of the record and an appendix to appellant’s brief which shall contain a copy of each item of the record necessary to consider the questions raised [771]*771(22 NYCRR 800.18, eff July 1, 1976). In the future, an appellant’s disregard of rules intended to reduce the expense of prosecuting compensation appeals will be taken into consideration in awarding costs pursuant to CPLR 8107. Koreman, P. J., Greenblott, Main, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by respondent Special Fund for reargument and for review of taxation of costs on the appeal pursuant to CPLR 8404, denied, without costs. Although denying review of the taxation of costs in this case, the court notes that the printed record contains material which, although included in the board’s full record list, is irrelevant to the issues raised on the appeal. We disapprove of this practice and call attention to the board’s rule for shortening the record list (12 NYCRR 300.18) and to our new rule which directs that workmen’s compensation appeals shall be heard upon one copy of the record and an appendix to appellant’s brief which shall contain a copy of each item of the record necessary to consider the questions raised [771]*771(22 NYCRR 800.18, eff July 1, 1976). In the future, an appellant’s disregard of rules intended to reduce the expense of prosecuting compensation appeals will be taken into consideration in awarding costs pursuant to CPLR 8107. Koreman, P. J., Greenblott, Main, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 A.D.2d 770, 387 N.Y.S.2d 176, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14447, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-mc-coy-v-perlite-concrete-co-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack