Claim of Mayrhofer v. Texteel Wire Strip Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Mayrhofer v. Texteel Wire Strip Co.

273 A.D. 934, 77 N.Y.S.2d 899, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5331

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 31, 1948

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 273 A.D. 934 (Claim of Mayrhofer v. Texteel Wire Strip Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Mayrhofer v. Texteel Wire Strip Co., 273 A.D. 934, 77 N.Y.S.2d 899, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5331 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

This is an appeal by employer and its insurance carrier from an award of compensation in favor of claimant. The board found that on June 25, 1940, while claimant was engaged in the regular course of his employment, he sustained accidental injuries arising out of such employment which resulted in his disability. The board also found that the claimant, on or about June 30, 1942, commenced a third party -action to recover damages and that the employer and carrier refused to consent to an offer of settlement or to accept an assignment of the third party action. Thereafter the action was abandoned. Appellants claim that their rights were prejudiced as a result. The board found that they were not prejudiced. The evidence sustains the [935]*935finding of the board. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation board. Present — Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Foster and Bussell, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is an appeal by employer and its insurance carrier from an award of compensation in favor of claimant. The board found that on June 25, 1940, while claimant was engaged in the regular course of his employment, he sustained accidental injuries arising out of such employment which resulted in his disability. The board also found that the claimant, on or about June 30, 1942, commenced a third party -action to recover damages and that the employer and carrier refused to consent to an offer of settlement or to accept an assignment of the third party action. Thereafter the action was abandoned. Appellants claim that their rights were prejudiced as a result. The board found that they were not prejudiced. The evidence sustains the [935]*935finding of the board. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation board. Present — Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Foster and Bussell, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

273 A.D. 934, 77 N.Y.S.2d 899, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-mayrhofer-v-texteel-wire-strip-co-nyappdiv-1948.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack