Claim of Mayer v. Eberhard Faber Pencil Co.

274 A.D. 1079, 85 N.Y.S.2d 659, 1949 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6142
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 19, 1949·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the employer and its insurance carrier from an award of compensation to claimant for disability. The sole issue on appeal is whether claimant’s accident arose out of and in the course of his employment. Claimant was subject to epileptic attacks. He fell to the street from a third floor window of the employer’s premises. Ho one witnessed the accident but the surrounding [1080] circumstances and the presumptions under the statute are sufficient to sustain the finding of an accident arising out of and in the course of employment. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Present — Foster, P. J., Heffernan, Deyo, Santry and Bergan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claim of Mayer v. Eberhard Faber Pencil Co., 274 A.D. 1079, 85 N.Y.S.2d 659, 1949 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6142 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).

274 A.D. 1079 (Claim of Mayer v. Eberhard Faber Pencil Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Torres Rivera v. Industrial Commission
85 P.R. 596 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1962)
Torres Rivera v. Comisión Industrial
85 P.R. Dec. 620 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1962)
Matter of Kleid v. Carr Bros.
90 N.E.2d 185 (New York Court of Appeals, 1949)