Claim of Martin v. Frank G. Shattuck Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Martin v. Frank G. Shattuck Co.

255 A.D. 739, 6 N.Y.S.2d 832, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4970

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 28, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 255 A.D. 739 (Claim of Martin v. Frank G. Shattuck Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Martin v. Frank G. Shattuck Co., 255 A.D. 739, 6 N.Y.S.2d 832, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4970 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an award of compensation made by the State Industrial Board under the Workmen’s Compensation Law for disability resulting from an occupational disease. Claimant was a porter in the restaurant conducted by the appellant-employer. In his work of mopping and cleaning he was compelled continually to press his knee against a mop wringer for about forty times an evening. This resulted in a patellar abscess and lymphangitis which the Board has found was contracted by him in the regular course of his employment and due to the nature of the employment. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffeman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an award of compensation made by the State Industrial Board under the Workmen’s Compensation Law for disability resulting from an occupational disease. Claimant was a porter in the restaurant conducted by the appellant-employer. In his work of mopping and cleaning he was compelled continually to press his knee against a mop wringer for about forty times an evening. This resulted in a patellar abscess and lymphangitis which the Board has found was contracted by him in the regular course of his employment and due to the nature of the employment. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffeman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

255 A.D. 739, 6 N.Y.S.2d 832, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4970, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-martin-v-frank-g-shattuck-co-nyappdiv-1938.