Claim of Marincel v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
359 N.E.2d 1368, 40 N.Y.2d 1032, 391 N.Y.S.2d 574, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3157
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (50 AD2d 630).
Concur: Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchs-berg and Cooke. Taking no part: Chief Judge Breitel.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of Marincel v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 359 N.E.2d 1368, 40 N.Y.2d 1032, 391 N.Y.S.2d 574, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3157 (N.Y. 1976).
359 N.E.2d 1368 (Claim of Marincel v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Claim of Nizich v. Robert F. Barreca, Inc.
86 A.D.2d 917 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)