Claim of Mang v. Actus Automobile Distributors, Inc.

62 A.D.2d 1103, 404 N.Y.S.2d 409, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11196
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 20, 1978·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed October 7, 1976. The board found: "based on the credible evidence, claimant was required to use his own automobile in order to perform his job; therefore his trip to work became part of his employment. It is, therefore, found that accident arising out of and in the course of employment is established.” Issues of fact are for the board and its decision is supported by substantial evidence and it is not erroneous as a matter of law (see Matter of Lutgen v Conte Elec., 50 AD2d 624; Matter of Shafran v Board of Educ., 25 AD2d 336, mot for lv to app den 18 NY2d 579). Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Greenblott, J. P., Main, Larkin, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claim of Mang v. Actus Automobile Distributors, Inc., 62 A.D.2d 1103, 404 N.Y.S.2d 409, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11196 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

62 A.D.2d 1103 (Claim of Mang v. Actus Automobile Distributors, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Claim of Deland v. Hutchings Psychiatric Center
203 A.D.2d 776 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Alitalia Linee Aeree Italiane v. Tornillo
617 A.2d 572 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1993)
Freebern v. North Rockland CDA
64 A.D.2d 300 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)