Claim of Mang v. Actus Automobile Distributors, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Mang v. Actus Automobile Distributors, Inc.

62 A.D.2d 1103, 404 N.Y.S.2d 409, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11196

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 20, 1978

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 62 A.D.2d 1103 (Claim of Mang v. Actus Automobile Distributors, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Mang v. Actus Automobile Distributors, Inc., 62 A.D.2d 1103, 404 N.Y.S.2d 409, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11196 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed October 7, 1976. The board found: "based on the credible evidence, claimant was required to use his own automobile in order to perform his job; therefore his trip to work became part of his employment. It is, therefore, found that accident arising out of and in the course of employment is established.” Issues of fact are for the board and its decision is supported by substantial evidence and it is not erroneous as a matter of law (see Matter of Lutgen v Conte Elec., 50 AD2d 624; Matter of Shafran v Board of Educ., 25 AD2d 336, mot for lv to app den 18 NY2d 579). Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Greenblott, J. P., Main, Larkin, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed October 7, 1976. The board found: "based on the credible evidence, claimant was required to use his own automobile in order to perform his job; therefore his trip to work became part of his employment. It is, therefore, found that accident arising out of and in the course of employment is established.” Issues of fact are for the board and its decision is supported by substantial evidence and it is not erroneous as a matter of law (see Matter of Lutgen v Conte Elec., 50 AD2d 624; Matter of Shafran v Board of Educ., 25 AD2d 336, mot for lv to app den 18 NY2d 579). Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Greenblott, J. P., Main, Larkin, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

62 A.D.2d 1103, 404 N.Y.S.2d 409, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-mang-v-actus-automobile-distributors-inc-nyappdiv-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack