Claim of Majka v. Dunkirk Radiator Corp.

20 A.D.2d 743, 246 N.Y.S.2d 853, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4394
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 20, 1964
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 20 A.D.2d 743 (Claim of Majka v. Dunkirk Radiator Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Majka v. Dunkirk Radiator Corp., 20 A.D.2d 743, 246 N.Y.S.2d 853, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4394 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Opinion

The award for permanent total disability caused by occupational silicosis was predicated upon the testimony of the board’s expert consultant on dust diseases that disability was due to silicosis, emphysema and chronic bronchitis, all of which he related to the occupation, and to arteriosclerotic heart disease and arteriosclerosis obliterans of both legs. Although the pulmonary disease was the “major disability ”, it alone was not totally disabling, but it did, in the doctor’s opinion, aggravate the arteriosclerotic heart disease and combine therewith to cause total disablement. The board was entitled to accept this testimony, as it did, and thereupon to find that the silicosis “adversely affected” the underlying arteriosclerotic heart disease with the result that the two conditions, thus related to each other, became inseparable causative agents and in combination caused total disability. There is ample authority for an award thus grounded. (See Matter of Ciesliewicz v. Dunkirk Radiator Corp., 17 A D 2d 877, and cases there cited.) Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Gibson, P. J,, Herlihy, Reynolds, Taylor and Aulisi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Claim of Blair v. Bendix Corp.
197 A.D.2d 750 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 A.D.2d 743, 246 N.Y.S.2d 853, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-majka-v-dunkirk-radiator-corp-nyappdiv-1964.