Claim of Magrossi v. City of Niagara Falls
This text of 243 A.D. 827 (Claim of Magrossi v. City of Niagara Falls) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Claimant, while in the employ of the city of Niagara Falls, was injured through the negligence of a third party. He elected to pursue his remedy against such third party in accordance with section 29 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Such an action was instituted against the third party and thereafter, with the city’s consent, compromised for the sum of $5,000 for personal injuries and medical and hospital expenses. Claimant then applied for deficiency compensation. The Industrial Board awarded him $647.27 for medical expenses incurred prior to the filing of the notice of election to hold the third party. It denied his claim for medical and hospital expenses amounting to $1,471.75 incurred subsequently to the filing of such notice. It based its decision on section 13 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Decision unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
243 A.D. 827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-magrossi-v-city-of-niagara-falls-nyappdiv-1935.