Claim of Mack v. State Street Mill Bargain Center, Inc.

17 A.D.2d 1006, 233 N.Y.S.2d 810, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6985
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 21, 1962·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Appeal from a decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Claimant, employed as a clerk in a department store, was injured at a picnic sponsored by the employer. Although the picnic was off premises, on Sunday, when no salary was paid and employees furnished their own transportation, it could be found on this record that the picnic was designed to promote good will of employees and within the business interest of the employer to sponsor it. Here the picnic was organized and financed by the employer, which posted a list of employees on the bulletin board with a request for those who would attend to cheek off their names. In holding that attendance at the picnic was in the course of employment the board was within Matter of Dodge v. Wm. J. Keller, Inc. (279 App. Div. 959, affd. 304 N. Y. 792) and Matter of Fagan v. Albany Evening Union Co. (261 App. Div. 861). Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claim of Mack v. State Street Mill Bargain Center, Inc., 17 A.D.2d 1006, 233 N.Y.S.2d 810, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6985 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

17 A.D.2d 1006 (Claim of Mack v. State Street Mill Bargain Center, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Claim of Lingyak v. J. C. Penney Co.
89 A.D.2d 655 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Nemeth v. Michigan Building Components
213 N.W.2d 144 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1973)
Lybrand, Ross Bros. & Montgomery v. Industrial Commission
223 N.E.2d 150 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1967)
Courville v. National Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc.
174 So. 2d 251 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1965)