Claim of Lindquist v. Friedelson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Lindquist v. Friedelson

232 A.D. 857

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 232 A.D. 857 (Claim of Lindquist v. Friedelson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Lindquist v. Friedelson, 232 A.D. 857 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

While there is a statement in the report of the doctor that there was loss of grasping power, that report not being verified is not competent proof. However, there appears competent proof of injury to the fingers sufficient to justify the award for a proportionate loss of use of the hand. (Matter of Petrie, 215 N. Y. 335.) All concur. Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

While there is a statement in the report of the doctor that there was loss of grasping power, that report not being verified is not competent proof. However, there appears competent proof of injury to the fingers sufficient to justify the award for a proportionate loss of use of the hand. (Matter of Petrie, 215 N. Y. 335.) All concur. Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

232 A.D. 857, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-lindquist-v-friedelson-nyappdiv-1931.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack