Claim of Lewis v. Toring Taxi Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Claim of Lewis v. Toring Taxi Co.

387 N.E.2d 618, 46 N.Y.2d 890, 414 N.Y.S.2d 686, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 1838

DecidedFebruary 13, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 387 N.E.2d 618 (Claim of Lewis v. Toring Taxi Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Lewis v. Toring Taxi Co., 387 N.E.2d 618, 46 N.Y.2d 890, 414 N.Y.S.2d 686, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 1838 (N.Y. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Whether claimant’s injury arose out of and in the course of his employment presents a question of fact which has been answered in the negative by the board. We cannot say, as a matter of law, that substantial evidence does not exist to support this determination. (See Matter of McGrinder v Sullivan, 290 NY 11, 12.)

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI