Claim of Leonescu v. Star Liquor Dealers, Inc.
232 N.E.2d 654, 20 N.Y.2d 880, 285 N.Y.S.2d 623, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1143
This text of 232 N.E.2d 654 (Claim of Leonescu v. Star Liquor Dealers, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Claim of Leonescu v. Star Liquor Dealers, Inc., 232 N.E.2d 654, 20 N.Y.2d 880, 285 N.Y.S.2d 623, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1143 (N.Y. 1967).
Opinion
Reargument directed and case set down for reargument during the November, 1967 session of the Court of Appeals. Upon such reargument, counsel are requested to address themselves to the applicability of the time limit set forth in section 123 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law irrespective of whether the board’s decision in vacating the closing was proper.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
232 N.E.2d 654, 20 N.Y.2d 880, 285 N.Y.S.2d 623, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-leonescu-v-star-liquor-dealers-inc-ny-1967.