Claim of Leon v. General Motors Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Leon v. General Motors Corp.

40 A.D.2d 882, 337 N.Y.S.2d 19, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3558

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 1, 1972

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 40 A.D.2d 882 (Claim of Leon v. General Motors Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Leon v. General Motors Corp., 40 A.D.2d 882, 337 N.Y.S.2d 19, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3558 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, dated June 14, 1971, which denied an application for reconsideration of an earlier board decision dated April 16, 1971 making an award. Such a reconsideration lies in the discretion of the board and is not reviewable unless the depial thereof is arbitrary and capricious (Matter of Cappellano v. Harry M. Stevens, Inc., 35 A D 2d 861). The facts supporting the original award sustain the refusal to reconsider, and no new facts have been introduced which would have altered said earlier decision. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Staley, Jr., J. P., Greenblott, Cooke, Kane and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, dated June 14, 1971, which denied an application for reconsideration of an earlier board decision dated April 16, 1971 making an award. Such a reconsideration lies in the discretion of the board and is not reviewable unless the depial thereof is arbitrary and capricious (Matter of Cappellano v. Harry M. Stevens, Inc., 35 A D 2d 861). The facts supporting the original award sustain the refusal to reconsider, and no new facts have been introduced which would have altered said earlier decision. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Staley, Jr., J. P., Greenblott, Cooke, Kane and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 A.D.2d 882, 337 N.Y.S.2d 19, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-leon-v-general-motors-corp-nyappdiv-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack