Claim of Latournerie v. Carney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Latournerie v. Carney

252 A.D. 713, 298 N.Y.S. 641, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5842

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 29, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 252 A.D. 713 (Claim of Latournerie v. Carney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Latournerie v. Carney, 252 A.D. 713, 298 N.Y.S. 641, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5842 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an award to claimant who sustained injuries to Ms right eye during Ms employment as a chef. The carrier’s policy was issued to the employer named who had died previous to the accident but whose restaurant business was continued by Ms son, pending Ms appointment as admimstrator. The policy provided that; “ the obligations and promises of the Company * * * shall not be affected * * * by the death * * * [714]*714of this Employer * * * as a result of which the conduct of this Employer’s business may be and continue to be in charge of an executor, administrator * * * or other person.” Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to be divided equally between the State Industrial Board and the claimant. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an award to claimant who sustained injuries to Ms right eye during Ms employment as a chef. The carrier’s policy was issued to the employer named who had died previous to the accident but whose restaurant business was continued by Ms son, pending Ms appointment as admimstrator. The policy provided that; “ the obligations and promises of the Company * * * shall not be affected * * * by the death * * * [714]*714of this Employer * * * as a result of which the conduct of this Employer’s business may be and continue to be in charge of an executor, administrator * * * or other person.” Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to be divided equally between the State Industrial Board and the claimant. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

252 A.D. 713, 298 N.Y.S. 641, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5842, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-latournerie-v-carney-nyappdiv-1937.