Claim of Lapp v. Noble

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Lapp v. Noble

224 A.D. 679

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1928·Published

Opinion

Award reversed and claim remitted, with costs against the State Industrial Board to abide the event, on the ground that, while the finding as to an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of the employment is supported by a fair inference from the facts proved (Matter of Norris v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 246 N. Y. 307), and the finding as to dependency has some evidence to [680]*680sustain it, the employment in which deceased was injured was seasonal and his average weekly wages should have been determined under subdivision 3 of section 14 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. (Gruber v. Kramer Amusement Corp., 207 App. Div. 564.) Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman, Whitmyer, Hill and Hasbrouck, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Award reversed and claim remitted, with costs against the State Industrial Board to abide the event, on the ground that, while the finding as to an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of the employment is supported by a fair inference from the facts proved (Matter of Norris v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 246 N. Y. 307), and the finding as to dependency has some evidence to [680]*680sustain it, the employment in which deceased was injured was seasonal and his average weekly wages should have been determined under subdivision 3 of section 14 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. (Gruber v. Kramer Amusement Corp., 207 App. Div. 564.) Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman, Whitmyer, Hill and Hasbrouck, JJ., concur.

Claim of Lapp v. Noble, 224 A.D. 679 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

224 A.D. 679 (Claim of Lapp v. Noble) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related