Claim of Lapinsky v. Ardom Bake Shop, Inc.
196 N.E.2d 737, 13 N.Y.2d 1163
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs to respondent Workmen’s Compensation Board; no opinion.
[1165] Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Burke and Scileppi. Judge Van Voorhis dissents and votes to reverse and to dismiss the claim upon the ground that it is barred, as matter of law, by section 40 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Taking no part: Judge Bergan.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of Lapinsky v. Ardom Bake Shop, Inc., 196 N.E.2d 737, 13 N.Y.2d 1163 (N.Y. 1964).
196 N.E.2d 737 (Claim of Lapinsky v. Ardom Bake Shop, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Claim of Yannon v. New York Telephone Co.
86 A.D.2d 241 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)