Claim of Lapinsky v. Ardom Bake Shop, Inc.
196 N.E.2d 737, 13 N.Y.2d 1163
This text of 196 N.E.2d 737 (Claim of Lapinsky v. Ardom Bake Shop, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Claim of Lapinsky v. Ardom Bake Shop, Inc., 196 N.E.2d 737, 13 N.Y.2d 1163 (N.Y. 1964).
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs to respondent Workmen’s Compensation Board; no opinion.
[1165]*1165Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Burke and Scileppi. Judge Van Voorhis dissents and votes to reverse and to dismiss the claim upon the ground that it is barred, as matter of law, by section 40 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Taking no part: Judge Bergan.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Claim of Yannon v. New York Telephone Co.
86 A.D.2d 241 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
196 N.E.2d 737, 13 N.Y.2d 1163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-lapinsky-v-ardom-bake-shop-inc-ny-1964.