Claim of Lane v. Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance
358 N.E.2d 1037, 40 N.Y.2d 943, 390 N.Y.S.2d 412, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3126
Opinion
Order affirmed, without costs, on the opinion by then Presiding Justice J. Clarence Herlihy at the Appellate Division (47 AD2d 183).
Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg. Judges Jasen, Gabrielli and Cooke dissent and vote to reverse on the dissenting opinion by Mr. Justice Robert G. Main at the Appellate Division (47 AD2d 183, 186-187).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of Lane v. Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance, 358 N.E.2d 1037, 40 N.Y.2d 943, 390 N.Y.S.2d 412, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3126 (N.Y. 1976).
358 N.E.2d 1037 (Claim of Lane v. Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Claim of Vasquez v. Gotham Hotel
93 A.D.2d 929 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)