Claim of Lamb v. Slote

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Lamb v. Slote

268 A.D. 946, 51 N.Y.S.2d 347, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4343

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 22, 1944

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 268 A.D. 946 (Claim of Lamb v. Slote) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Lamb v. Slote, 268 A.D. 946, 51 N.Y.S.2d 347, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4343 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by insurance carrier from an award and decision of the State Industrial Board made under the Workmen’s Compensation Law in favor of claimant. The only question presented is whether the insurance policy issued by appellant to the employer-respondent covered the claimant. The kind and nature of the duties of claimant’s employment, including the work in which he was engaged when he met with injury by accident, and the arrangement made by the employer-respondent for the performance of those duties brought claimant within the coverage of the policy. Any doubt raised by the literalness of the policy provisions is resolved by the statute. (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 54, subd. 4.) Award and decision affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. All concur. [See post, p. 1072.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by insurance carrier from an award and decision of the State Industrial Board made under the Workmen’s Compensation Law in favor of claimant. The only question presented is whether the insurance policy issued by appellant to the employer-respondent covered the claimant. The kind and nature of the duties of claimant’s employment, including the work in which he was engaged when he met with injury by accident, and the arrangement made by the employer-respondent for the performance of those duties brought claimant within the coverage of the policy. Any doubt raised by the literalness of the policy provisions is resolved by the statute. (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 54, subd. 4.) Award and decision affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. All concur. [See post, p. 1072.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

268 A.D. 946, 51 N.Y.S.2d 347, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-lamb-v-slote-nyappdiv-1944.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack