Claim of LaGala v. Huber

236 A.D. 874

Opinion

Award reversed and claim remitted for further consideration, with costs against the State Industrial Board to abide the event, on the ground that there is no evidence to support the finding that notice could not be given within thirty days because the claimant was not aware of the serious nature of his accident; and facts have not been found which justify the finding that the employer was not prejudiced by claimant’s failure to give written notice of injury. (Matter of Bloomfield v. November, 219 N. Y. 374; Prokopiak v. Buffalo Gas Co., 176 App. Div. 128; Dorb v. Stearns & Co., 180 id. 138.) Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman and Rhodes, JJ., concur; Hill, J., dissents and votes to affirm; MeNamee, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claim of LaGala v. Huber, 236 A.D. 874 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

236 A.D. 874 (Claim of LaGala v. Huber) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Bloomfield v. . November
114 N.E. 805 (New York Court of Appeals, 1916)
Claim of Prokopiak v. Buffalo Gas Co.
176 A.D. 128 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1916)