Claim of La Burt v. Perfumes

274 A.D. 866, 81 N.Y.S.2d 795, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3728
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 24, 1948
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 274 A.D. 866 (Claim of La Burt v. Perfumes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of La Burt v. Perfumes, 274 A.D. 866, 81 N.Y.S.2d 795, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3728 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).

Opinion

The appellant insurance carrier, the State Insurance Fund, questions the form and manner of payment of an award of death benefits ,to a dependent incompetent adult daughter of a deceased employee. On a former appeal a prior award was reversed and remitted for further consideration because the form and manner of its payments were found erroneous (see 273 App. Div. 836). The payee of the award is an inmate of the Creedmoor State Hospital and permanently totally disabled by reason of dementia praecox, and has no committee of her property. The present award is for sixty-seven past weeks, totalling $234.50 and directs its payment to the director of the hospital for the benefit of the incompetent. This we consider authorized by subdivision 14 of section 34 of the Mental Hygiene Law which provides that the moneys of such incompetent shall be placed to the credit of the inmate and disbursed on the order of the director to provide luxuries, comforts and necessities ” of the inmate, “ including support and burial expenses.” On the argument the Attorney-General represented that the amount of the award is so small that it would doubtless be used to provide luxuries and comforts for this incompetent and not for or on account of her cost and maintenance in the hospital. On the assumption that the director will act accordingly, we affirm the order and decision appealed from thus avoiding the necessity of the appointment of a committee with its accompanying expense. Decision and award affirmed, without costs. Present — -Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Foster and Deyo, JJ. [gee post, p. 949.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Accounting of Arnold
26 Misc. 2d 298 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
274 A.D. 866, 81 N.Y.S.2d 795, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3728, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-la-burt-v-perfumes-nyappdiv-1948.