Claim of Kusel v. Eastern Bridle Iron & Steel Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Kusel v. Eastern Bridle Iron & Steel Corp.

258 A.D. 831, 15 N.Y.S.2d 569, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7148

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1939

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 258 A.D. 831 (Claim of Kusel v. Eastern Bridle Iron & Steel Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Kusel v. Eastern Bridle Iron & Steel Corp., 258 A.D. 831, 15 N.Y.S.2d 569, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7148 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Claimant’s employment required that he carry heavy lengths of pipe to a shop where he fitted it by cutting and threading. On the day of the accident, which was an extremely warm day, he had worked continually from eight in the morning until between five and six in the evening. The later half hour of the time he was asked to work rapidly to permit an early delivery. During this later period he was stricken with a heart attack which disabled him from working during the period for which the award was made. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present—'Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffeman and Foster, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claimant’s employment required that he carry heavy lengths of pipe to a shop where he fitted it by cutting and threading. On the day of the accident, which was an extremely warm day, he had worked continually from eight in the morning until between five and six in the evening. The later half hour of the time he was asked to work rapidly to permit an early delivery. During this later period he was stricken with a heart attack which disabled him from working during the period for which the award was made. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present—'Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffeman and Foster, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 A.D. 831, 15 N.Y.S.2d 569, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-kusel-v-eastern-bridle-iron-steel-corp-nyappdiv-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack