Claim of Kusel v. Eastern Bridle Iron & Steel Corp.
28 N.E.2d 400, 283 N.Y. 671, 1940 N.Y. LEXIS 1111
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Loughran, Pinch, Rippey, Lewis and Conway, JJ. Lehman, Ch. J., and Sears, J., dissent on the ground that there is neither finding nor testimony that the injury was caused by an accident.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of Kusel v. Eastern Bridle Iron & Steel Corp., 28 N.E.2d 400, 283 N.Y. 671, 1940 N.Y. LEXIS 1111 (N.Y. 1940).
28 N.E.2d 400 (Claim of Kusel v. Eastern Bridle Iron & Steel Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Harbor Marine Contracting Co. v. Lowe
152 F.2d 845 (Second Circuit, 1945)
Claim of LaFountain v. LaFountain
259 A.D. 1095 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1940)