Claim of Kusel v. Eastern Bridle Iron & Steel Corp.
28 N.E.2d 400, 283 N.Y. 671, 1940 N.Y. LEXIS 1111
This text of 28 N.E.2d 400 (Claim of Kusel v. Eastern Bridle Iron & Steel Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Claim of Kusel v. Eastern Bridle Iron & Steel Corp., 28 N.E.2d 400, 283 N.Y. 671, 1940 N.Y. LEXIS 1111 (N.Y. 1940).
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Loughran, Pinch, Rippey, Lewis and Conway, JJ. Lehman, Ch. J., and Sears, J., dissent on the ground that there is neither finding nor testimony that the injury was caused by an accident.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Harbor Marine Contracting Co. v. Lowe
152 F.2d 845 (Second Circuit, 1945)
Claim of LaFountain v. LaFountain
259 A.D. 1095 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1940)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
28 N.E.2d 400, 283 N.Y. 671, 1940 N.Y. LEXIS 1111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-kusel-v-eastern-bridle-iron-steel-corp-ny-1940.