Claim of Krystofik v. General Electric Co.
54 A.D.2d 828, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12610
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 12, 1975·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Motion by appellant for order directing the Attorney-General to serve the full record list pursuant to section 300.18 of the rules of the Workmen’s Compensation Board (12 NYCRR 300.18) and for stay pending appeal, granted, without costs. Cross motion to dismiss appeal on the ground that the board’s decision of January 30, 1974 is interlocutory and therefore not appealable as a matter of law, denied, without costs. Sweeney, J. P., Kane, Koreman, Main and Larkin, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of Krystofik v. General Electric Co., 54 A.D.2d 828, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12610 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).
54 A.D.2d 828 (Claim of Krystofik v. General Electric Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McDowell v. La Voy
59 A.D.2d 995 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)