Claim of Kristiansen v. Frank McWilliams, Inc.
275 A.D.2d 1009
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 28, 1949
StatusPublished
This text of 275 A.D.2d 1009 (Claim of Kristiansen v. Frank McWilliams, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Claim of Kristiansen v. Frank McWilliams, Inc., 275 A.D.2d 1009 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).
Opinion
Brewster, Santry and Bergan, JJ., concur; Foster, P. J., concurs for reversal but not for a dismissal of the claim. I think in the interests of justice the claim should be remitted to the Workmen’s Compensation Board for additional proof; Heffernan, J., dissents, and votes to affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
275 A.D.2d 1009, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-kristiansen-v-frank-mcwilliams-inc-nyappdiv-1949.