Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Claim of Krevac v. 310 East 55th Street, Inc.

Claim of Krevac v. 310 East 55th Street, Inc.

261 A.D. 860, 26 N.Y.S.2d 608, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7800
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1941·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Acting under and pursuant to the provisions of section 123 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, the State Industrial Board in the interest of justice properly reopened the case, set aside a previous decision disaEowing the claim and made the award appealed from. The evidence amply supported the award and the State Industrial Board had jurisdiction to do so. (Matter of Ingberg v, Zimmerman, 261 N. Y. 551.) [861]*861Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, HefEernan and Foster, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claim of Krevac v. 310 East 55th Street, Inc., 261 A.D. 860, 26 N.Y.S.2d 608, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7800 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

261 A.D. 860 (Claim of Krevac v. 310 East 55th Street, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Claim of Parella v. Harrod Steel Erection Co.
19 A.D.2d 451 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1963)
Claim of Desrosiers v. A. Filkins, Inc.
11 A.D.2d 820 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1960)
Claim of Palmeri v. E. I. duPont deNemours & Co.
3 A.D.2d 782 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1957)