Claim of Kramer v. Saluda Knitting Mills, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Kramer v. Saluda Knitting Mills, Inc.

62 A.D.2d 1098, 404 N.Y.S.2d 414, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11189

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 20, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 62 A.D.2d 1098 (Claim of Kramer v. Saluda Knitting Mills, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Kramer v. Saluda Knitting Mills, Inc., 62 A.D.2d 1098, 404 N.Y.S.2d 414, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11189 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed September 17, 1976. The board found: “employer-employee relationship, jurisdiction in New York State, and that the claimant sustained an occupational bronchitis, causally related to his employment”. The decision is supported by substantial evidence and the appellants have not demonstrated that the board acted arbitrarily in refusing to restore the case to the referee calendar for further evidence. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board against the employer and its insurance carrier. Greenblott, J. P., Main, Larkin, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed September 17, 1976. The board found: “employer-employee relationship, jurisdiction in New York State, and that the claimant sustained an occupational bronchitis, causally related to his employment”. The decision is supported by substantial evidence and the appellants have not demonstrated that the board acted arbitrarily in refusing to restore the case to the referee calendar for further evidence. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board against the employer and its insurance carrier. Greenblott, J. P., Main, Larkin, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

62 A.D.2d 1098, 404 N.Y.S.2d 414, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-kramer-v-saluda-knitting-mills-inc-nyappdiv-1978.