Claim of Kozol v. Hasenohrl

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Kozol v. Hasenohrl

271 A.D.2d 853

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 20, 1946

StatusPublished

This text of 271 A.D.2d 853 (Claim of Kozol v. Hasenohrl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Kozol v. Hasenohrl, 271 A.D.2d 853 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

This is an appeal by the employer and insurance carrier from an award in favor of the claimant. Claimant and her husband were employed jointly as superintendents of a rooming house in New York City. The board found that while claimant was engaged in the regular course of her employment and while working for her employer, while asleep in her bed in the apartment in which she was living, the use of which apartment was part of her salary, she sustained accidental injuries in the nature of severe burns. The board also found that her employment required her to be on duty at all times. The evidence sustains the findings. Award affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. All concur. [See post, p. 939.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is an appeal by the employer and insurance carrier from an award in favor of the claimant. Claimant and her husband were employed jointly as superintendents of a rooming house in New York City. The board found that while claimant was engaged in the regular course of her employment and while working for her employer, while asleep in her bed in the apartment in which she was living, the use of which apartment was part of her salary, she sustained accidental injuries in the nature of severe burns. The board also found that her employment required her to be on duty at all times. The evidence sustains the findings. Award affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. All concur. [See post, p. 939.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

271 A.D.2d 853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-kozol-v-hasenohrl-nyappdiv-1946.