Claim of Kolvig v. Oakwood

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Kolvig v. Oakwood

78 A.D.2d 759, 432 N.Y.S.2d 750, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13433

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 30, 1980

StatusPublished

This text of 78 A.D.2d 759 (Claim of Kolvig v. Oakwood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Kolvig v. Oakwood, 78 A.D.2d 759, 432 N.Y.S.2d 750, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13433 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from decisions of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed June 1, 1978 (as corrected June 20, 1979) and January 30, 1979. The board found: "based on the claimant’s testimony, the report of Director, Dr. Bourn, the medical reports of Dr. Korner, Dr. Wilkie and Dr. Watsky, that the [760]*760unique work program the claimant was administering resulted in sufficient stress and pressure to cause a condition diagnosed as unipolar depressive reaction, and that this constitutes an accidental injury arising out of and in the. course of his employment.” The board’s decision is supported by substantial evidence and must be affirmed (Matter of Gamble v New York State Narcotics Addict Control Comm., 60 AD2d 703). Decisions affirmed, with costs to the Workers’ Compensation Board against the employer and its insurance carrier. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Main and Mikoll, JJ., concur; Staley, Jr., J., not taking part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from decisions of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed June 1, 1978 (as corrected June 20, 1979) and January 30, 1979. The board found: "based on the claimant’s testimony, the report of Director, Dr. Bourn, the medical reports of Dr. Korner, Dr. Wilkie and Dr. Watsky, that the [760]*760unique work program the claimant was administering resulted in sufficient stress and pressure to cause a condition diagnosed as unipolar depressive reaction, and that this constitutes an accidental injury arising out of and in the. course of his employment.” The board’s decision is supported by substantial evidence and must be affirmed (Matter of Gamble v New York State Narcotics Addict Control Comm., 60 AD2d 703). Decisions affirmed, with costs to the Workers’ Compensation Board against the employer and its insurance carrier. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Main and Mikoll, JJ., concur; Staley, Jr., J., not taking part.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

78 A.D.2d 759, 432 N.Y.S.2d 750, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-kolvig-v-oakwood-nyappdiv-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack