Claim of Kolpien v. O'Donnell Lumber Co.

191 A.D. 764, 182 N.Y.S. 155, 1920 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4804

This text of 191 A.D. 764 (Claim of Kolpien v. O'Donnell Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Kolpien v. O'Donnell Lumber Co., 191 A.D. 764, 182 N.Y.S. 155, 1920 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4804 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

Kiley, J.:

The O’Donnell Lumber Company is a corporation which runs a planing mill at Dunkirk, N. Y. The claimant was president and general manager, receiving a salary of $2,500 a year. He worked in the lumber yard, cut glass, set glass, operated machinery, including planer, jointer, circular and band saws. The policy of insurance issued to this employer covered the claimant and the premium paid therefor specifically covered his proportion of the insurance. The policy, issued on Septem[765]*765ber 17, 1918, was in effect on December 6, 1918, the day when claimant was injured; while operating the rip saw, a piece of board, wedged in the gig saw, flew, hit his left hand, crippling it. The employer and insurance carrier contend that he is not entitled to compensation because he was president as well as general manager, and that he owned a majority of the stock; that Matter of Bowne v. Bowne Co. (221 N. Y. 28) and Kennedy v. Kennedy Mfg. & Engineering Co. (177 App. Div. 56; reargued, 182 id. 907) settle the law against the claimant. We have written in Hubbs v. Addison Electric Light & Power Co. (191 App. Div., 765), argued at this term, raising the same question; and we hive found that the amendment (Laws of 1916, chap. 622) to section 54 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law which went into effect June 1, 1916, adding to the section subdivision 6, took that case, and, if we are right, takes this case, out of the rule laid down in Matter of Bowne v. Bowne Co., cited by appellants, because the amendment was enacted after the accident in Matter of Bowne v. Bowne Co. occurred.

The award should be affirmed.

Award unanimously affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Claim of Bowne v. S. W. Bowne Co.
116 N.E. 364 (New York Court of Appeals, 1917)
Claim of Kennedy v. Kennedy Manufacturing & Engineering Co.
177 A.D. 56 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1917)
Hubbs v. Addison Electric Light & Power Co.
191 A.D. 765 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
191 A.D. 764, 182 N.Y.S. 155, 1920 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4804, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-kolpien-v-odonnell-lumber-co-nyappdiv-1920.