Claim of Kogelets v. National Stables, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Kogelets v. National Stables, Inc.

250 A.D. 803, 296 N.Y.S. 255, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9057

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 17, 1937

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 250 A.D. 803 (Claim of Kogelets v. National Stables, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Kogelets v. National Stables, Inc., 250 A.D. 803, 296 N.Y.S. 255, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9057 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

This is a second appeal in this matter. [See 240 App. Div. 741.] The evidence introduced at the hearings held after the claim was remitted by the Appellate Division amply sustains the findings of the Industrial Board that the claimant is not the widow of the deceased employee. Decision and award unanimously affirmed. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ. pi In the Matter of the Estate of Elizabeth Stewart Hessler, Deceased; In the Matter of the Estate of Mart L. Lillie, Deceased.— This is an appeal from a decree of the surrogate of Madison- county based upon an agreed set of facts that involves the construction of the will of Elizabeth Stewart Hessler and the rights of the estate of Mary L. Lillie therein. The provisions contained in the Hessler will for maintenance and support is not an absolute power of disposition. It is only for a specific purpose and the fee vests in the designated remainderman subject to the limited powers of disposition for the support and maintenance of the life tenant. The power of Mary L. Lillie to dispose of the Hessler estate had to be exercised in her life time to be effective. She could make no testamentary disposition of the Hessler estate. Decree unanimously affirmed, with costs to all parties filing briefs, payable out of the estate. Present — 'Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffeman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is a second appeal in this matter. [See 240 App. Div. 741.] The evidence introduced at the hearings held after the claim was remitted by the Appellate Division amply sustains the findings of the Industrial Board that the claimant is not the widow of the deceased employee. Decision and award unanimously affirmed. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ. pi In the Matter of the Estate of Elizabeth Stewart Hessler, Deceased; In the Matter of the Estate of Mart L. Lillie, Deceased.— This is an appeal from a decree of the surrogate of Madison- county based upon an agreed set of facts that involves the construction of the will of Elizabeth Stewart Hessler and the rights of the estate of Mary L. Lillie therein. The provisions contained in the Hessler will for maintenance and support is not an absolute power of disposition. It is only for a specific purpose and the fee vests in the designated remainderman subject to the limited powers of disposition for the support and maintenance of the life tenant. The power of Mary L. Lillie to dispose of the Hessler estate had to be exercised in her life time to be effective. She could make no testamentary disposition of the Hessler estate. Decree unanimously affirmed, with costs to all parties filing briefs, payable out of the estate. Present — 'Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffeman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

250 A.D. 803, 296 N.Y.S. 255, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9057, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-kogelets-v-national-stables-inc-nyappdiv-1937.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack