Claim of Koehler v. Armour & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Koehler v. Armour & Co.

235 A.D. 644

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 235 A.D. 644 (Claim of Koehler v. Armour & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Koehler v. Armour & Co., 235 A.D. 644 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs to the State Industrial Board against the employer and the insurance carrier. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Motion to permit the memorandum (attached to motion papers) to be filed herein nunc pro tunc granted, and decision* amended by adding thereto the following: The court has considered and passed upon the constitutional question, under section 20 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Motion for stay denied. McNamee, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs to the State Industrial Board against the employer and the insurance carrier. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Motion to permit the memorandum (attached to motion papers) to be filed herein nunc pro tunc granted, and decision* amended by adding thereto the following: The court has considered and passed upon the constitutional question, under section 20 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Motion for stay denied. McNamee, J., not voting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

235 A.D. 644, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-koehler-v-armour-co-nyappdiv-1932.