Claim of Knorr v. General Baking Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Knorr v. General Baking Co.

243 A.D. 828

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 243 A.D. 828 (Claim of Knorr v. General Baking Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Knorr v. General Baking Co., 243 A.D. 828 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the claimant from a decision of the Industrial Board denying an award for death benefits. Deceased employee was employed as a salesman delivering bread. He died as a result of an infection claimed to have resulted from a cut upon the knuckle of his left index finger. Claimant, his widow, produced evidence to the effect that deceased stated that he cut his finger on a bread basket while delivering bread. She also produced testimony of certain witnesses who testified to seeing a cut upon the finger of deceased. Award of death benefits was denied upon the ground that the hearsay declarations of the deceased were not sufficiently corroborated. Decision unanimously affirmed. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the claimant from a decision of the Industrial Board denying an award for death benefits. Deceased employee was employed as a salesman delivering bread. He died as a result of an infection claimed to have resulted from a cut upon the knuckle of his left index finger. Claimant, his widow, produced evidence to the effect that deceased stated that he cut his finger on a bread basket while delivering bread. She also produced testimony of certain witnesses who testified to seeing a cut upon the finger of deceased. Award of death benefits was denied upon the ground that the hearsay declarations of the deceased were not sufficiently corroborated. Decision unanimously affirmed. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

243 A.D. 828, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-knorr-v-general-baking-co-nyappdiv-1935.