Claim of Kluger v. Mansion

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Kluger v. Mansion

262 A.D. 784, 27 N.Y.S.2d 309, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5843

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 7, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 262 A.D. 784 (Claim of Kluger v. Mansion) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Kluger v. Mansion, 262 A.D. 784, 27 N.Y.S.2d 309, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5843 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

The claimant seeks compensation for an alleged occupational disease. She was employed as a cook by the employer-respondent for nine years prior to her disablement. Her work included general cooking and preparation of foodstuffs and the handling of a large amount of poultry. Her contention is that she sustained her rash as a result of acids or oils in the chickens, but nowhere in the record is there proof concerning the presence of acids or oils in chickens or the waters in which they soak. The medical testimony produced by claimant does not substantiate her claim and there is a total failure to connect the claimant’s claim with her occupation under any provision of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Decision of the State Industrial Board dismissing the claim affirmed, without costs. Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Schenck and Foster, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The claimant seeks compensation for an alleged occupational disease. She was employed as a cook by the employer-respondent for nine years prior to her disablement. Her work included general cooking and preparation of foodstuffs and the handling of a large amount of poultry. Her contention is that she sustained her rash as a result of acids or oils in the chickens, but nowhere in the record is there proof concerning the presence of acids or oils in chickens or the waters in which they soak. The medical testimony produced by claimant does not substantiate her claim and there is a total failure to connect the claimant’s claim with her occupation under any provision of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Decision of the State Industrial Board dismissing the claim affirmed, without costs. Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Schenck and Foster, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 A.D. 784, 27 N.Y.S.2d 309, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5843, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-kluger-v-mansion-nyappdiv-1941.