Claim of Kirschenbaum v. Reliable Plastics Corp.

39 A.D.2d 621, 331 N.Y.S.2d 116, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4773
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 27, 1972·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed April 15, 1971. The board affirmed the Referee’s finding of no compensable lost time, determining that appellant’s income from corporate respondent was salary for services performed. This amount exceeds a sum represented by the established average weekly wage. There is substantial evidence to support this determination and to reject appellant’s contention that a portion of this income represented profits and not earnings (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 15, subd. 5-a). Matter of Roberge v. United Bd. & Carton Corp. (21 A D 2d 713) is clearly distinguishable on its facts and does not require a contrary result. The issue presented being essentially one of fact, we are bound by the board’s determination (Matter of Kopec v. Buffalo Brake Beam-Acme Steel & Malleable Iron Works, 304 N. Y. 65). Decision affirmed, without costs. Staley, Jr., J. P., Greenblott, Sweeney, Kane and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claim of Kirschenbaum v. Reliable Plastics Corp., 39 A.D.2d 621, 331 N.Y.S.2d 116, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4773 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

39 A.D.2d 621 (Claim of Kirschenbaum v. Reliable Plastics Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cozzi v. Christensen & Nielson, Inc.
48 A.D.2d 720 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)