Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Claim of Kiriloff v. A. G. W. Wet Wash Laundry, Inc.

Claim of Kiriloff v. A. G. W. Wet Wash Laundry, Inc.

258 A.D. 818, 15 N.Y.S.2d 815, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7094
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Claim of Kiriloff v. A. G. W. Wet Wash Laundry, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 257 A.D. 37 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 1, 1939·Published

Opinion

Motion by Special Funds Conservation Committee, intervening petitioner, for order directing return of remittitur, withdrawing opinion and remitting matter to State Industrial Board for a rehearing, or for a reargument. Motion by Attorney-General for reargument upon the record and affidavits or for reconsideration of determination and an order remitting matter to State Industrial Board for a new trial. Motions denied, with ten dollars costs in each action. [See 257 App. Div. 37.] Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Sehenek and Foster, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claim of Kiriloff v. A. G. W. Wet Wash Laundry, Inc., 258 A.D. 818, 15 N.Y.S.2d 815, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7094 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

258 A.D. 818 (Claim of Kiriloff v. A. G. W. Wet Wash Laundry, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Claim of Kiriloff v. A. G. W. Wet Wash Laundry, Inc.
257 A.D. 37 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1939)