Claim of Kestenbaum v. Dunrite Painting Co.
178 N.E.2d 430, 10 N.Y.2d 838
This text of 178 N.E.2d 430 (Claim of Kestenbaum v. Dunrite Painting Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Claim of Kestenbaum v. Dunrite Painting Co., 178 N.E.2d 430, 10 N.Y.2d 838 (N.Y. 1961).
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs to respondent Workmen’s Compensation Board; no opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Roan Eagle v. State
468 N.W.2d 382 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1991)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
178 N.E.2d 430, 10 N.Y.2d 838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-kestenbaum-v-dunrite-painting-co-ny-1961.