Claim of Kerr v. Clifton Fine Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Kerr v. Clifton Fine Hospital

19 A.D.2d 668, 241 N.Y.S.2d 91, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3470

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 27, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 19 A.D.2d 668 (Claim of Kerr v. Clifton Fine Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Kerr v. Clifton Fine Hospital, 19 A.D.2d 668, 241 N.Y.S.2d 91, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3470 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

— As against appellants’ medical evidence and their contentions, first, that there was no disability after December 11, 1957 attributable to the first accident and, second, that there was no substantial evidence supportive of the board’s allocation of the disability, the board was entitled to accept the finding by the treating osteopath of continuing disability attributable to both accidents and the opinion of the board’s examining physician that claimant has a permanent .partial disability, attributable two thirds to the first accident and one third to the second; and we are unable to account the evidence thus accepted as less than substantial. Decision unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s -Compensation Board. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— As against appellants’ medical evidence and their contentions, first, that there was no disability after December 11, 1957 attributable to the first accident and, second, that there was no substantial evidence supportive of the board’s allocation of the disability, the board was entitled to accept the finding by the treating osteopath of continuing disability attributable to both accidents and the opinion of the board’s examining physician that claimant has a permanent .partial disability, attributable two thirds to the first accident and one third to the second; and we are unable to account the evidence thus accepted as less than substantial. Decision unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s -Compensation Board. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 A.D.2d 668, 241 N.Y.S.2d 91, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-kerr-v-clifton-fine-hospital-nyappdiv-1963.