Claim of Kempel v. Nichols

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Kempel v. Nichols

78 A.D.2d 759, 432 N.Y.S.2d 751, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13311

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 30, 1980

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 78 A.D.2d 759 (Claim of Kempel v. Nichols) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Kempel v. Nichols, 78 A.D.2d 759, 432 N.Y.S.2d 751, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13311 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeals from decisions of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed December 1, 1977, August 16, 1979 and January 10, 1980, which found accident and causal relationship and excused claimant’s failure to give timely written notice. The board found: "based on the claimant’s testimony at the Board Hearing, that claimant’s immediate supervisor, Ed Miller, had knowledge of claimant’s accident * * * that, for this reason, claimant’s failure to give written notice of injury is excused.” There is substantial evidence to sustain the determination of the board. Decisions affirmed, with costs to the Workers’ Compensation Board against the employer and its insurance carrier. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Main and Mikoll, JJ., concur; Staley, Jr., J., not taking part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals from decisions of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed December 1, 1977, August 16, 1979 and January 10, 1980, which found accident and causal relationship and excused claimant’s failure to give timely written notice. The board found: "based on the claimant’s testimony at the Board Hearing, that claimant’s immediate supervisor, Ed Miller, had knowledge of claimant’s accident * * * that, for this reason, claimant’s failure to give written notice of injury is excused.” There is substantial evidence to sustain the determination of the board. Decisions affirmed, with costs to the Workers’ Compensation Board against the employer and its insurance carrier. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Main and Mikoll, JJ., concur; Staley, Jr., J., not taking part.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

78 A.D.2d 759, 432 N.Y.S.2d 751, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-kempel-v-nichols-nyappdiv-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack