Claim of Keenholts v. Bayer Co.

238 A.D. 878

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The parties to this appeal have stipulated as follows: “It is hereby stipulated that the issue on this appeal is whether a schedule award under par. (E) Subdiv. 3 of See. 15, W. C. L., made for the loss of claimant’s left eye is payable to the widow of the deceased claimant in addition to the death benefits provided for in Section 16, W. C. L., where death resulted from the injuries.” Such schedule award is payable to the widow in addition to death benefits. (Workmen’s Comp. Law, § 33; Matter of Sienko v. Bopp & Morgenstern, 248 N. Y. 40; Matter of Hughes v. St. Patrick’s Cathedral, 245 id. 20.) Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ., concur. Decision reversed and claim remitted for an award in accordance with memorandum, with costs to the claimant against the State Industrial Board.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claim of Keenholts v. Bayer Co., 238 A.D. 878 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

238 A.D. 878 (Claim of Keenholts v. Bayer Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Claim of Sienko v. Bopp & Morgenstern
161 N.E. 324 (New York Court of Appeals, 1928)