Claim of Keenholts v. Bayer Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Keenholts v. Bayer Co.

238 A.D. 878

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1933

StatusPublished

This text of 238 A.D. 878 (Claim of Keenholts v. Bayer Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Keenholts v. Bayer Co., 238 A.D. 878 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The parties to this appeal have stipulated as follows: “It is hereby stipulated that the issue on this appeal is whether a schedule award under par. (E) Subdiv. 3 of See. 15, W. C. L., made for the loss of claimant’s left eye is payable to the widow of the deceased claimant in addition to the death benefits provided for in Section 16, W. C. L., where death resulted from the injuries.” Such schedule award is payable to the widow in addition to death benefits. (Workmen’s Comp. Law, § 33; Matter of Sienko v. Bopp & Morgenstern, 248 N. Y. 40; Matter of Hughes v. St. Patrick’s Cathedral, 245 id. 20.) Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ., concur. Decision reversed and claim remitted for an award in accordance with memorandum, with costs to the claimant against the State Industrial Board.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The parties to this appeal have stipulated as follows: “It is hereby stipulated that the issue on this appeal is whether a schedule award under par. (E) Subdiv. 3 of See. 15, W. C. L., made for the loss of claimant’s left eye is payable to the widow of the deceased claimant in addition to the death benefits provided for in Section 16, W. C. L., where death resulted from the injuries.” Such schedule award is payable to the widow in addition to death benefits. (Workmen’s Comp. Law, § 33; Matter of Sienko v. Bopp & Morgenstern, 248 N. Y. 40; Matter of Hughes v. St. Patrick’s Cathedral, 245 id. 20.) Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ., concur. Decision reversed and claim remitted for an award in accordance with memorandum, with costs to the claimant against the State Industrial Board.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

238 A.D. 878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-keenholts-v-bayer-co-nyappdiv-1933.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack