Claim of Kaufman v. Fairchild Engine & Airplane Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Kaufman v. Fairchild Engine & Airplane Corp.

272 A.D.2d 854

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 14, 1947

StatusPublished

This text of 272 A.D.2d 854 (Claim of Kaufman v. Fairchild Engine & Airplane Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Kaufman v. Fairchild Engine & Airplane Corp., 272 A.D.2d 854 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

This is an appeal by an employer and its insurance carrier from an award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board in favor of claimant. Claimant was employed as a tool grinder. On January 30, 1945, while claimant was engaged in the regular course of his employment and while raising a fixture weighing 100 pounds, he felt a sharp pain in his left side and suffered from anginal syndrome and a temporary aggravation of a pre-existing heart condition, as a result of which he became partially disabled. The evidence sustains the finding of the board. Award affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. All concur. [See post, p. 979.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is an appeal by an employer and its insurance carrier from an award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board in favor of claimant. Claimant was employed as a tool grinder. On January 30, 1945, while claimant was engaged in the regular course of his employment and while raising a fixture weighing 100 pounds, he felt a sharp pain in his left side and suffered from anginal syndrome and a temporary aggravation of a pre-existing heart condition, as a result of which he became partially disabled. The evidence sustains the finding of the board. Award affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. All concur. [See post, p. 979.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 A.D.2d 854, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-kaufman-v-fairchild-engine-airplane-corp-nyappdiv-1947.