Claim of Katz v. Reissman Rothman Corp.
261 A.D. 862, 24 N.Y.S.2d 807, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7804
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1941·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
— ■ Claimant was attacked by a coemployee who apparently was jealous of attentions paid to claimant by a third coemployee of the opposite sex. The injury arose out of and in the course of the employment. (Matter of Humphrey v. Tietzen & Steffin Milk Co., 235 App. Div. 470; affd., 261 N. Y. 549.) Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffeman and Foster, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of Katz v. Reissman Rothman Corp., 261 A.D. 862, 24 N.Y.S.2d 807, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7804 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).
261 A.D. 862 (Claim of Katz v. Reissman Rothman Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bell v. Kelso Oil Co.
597 S.W.2d 731 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1980)
Claim of Fragale v. Armory Maintenance
24 A.D.2d 302 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1966)
Mazarredo v. Levine
190 Misc. 953 (New York Supreme Court, 1948)
Rice v. Revere Copper & Brass, Inc.
48 A.2d 166 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1946)