Claim of Katz v. Pollyanna Trading Corp.
This text of 257 A.D. 1093 (Claim of Katz v. Pollyanna Trading Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— -The claimant was secretary and treasurer of the Pollyanna Trading Corp. and was a window trimmer and was injured in an accident while at work for the corporation-employer on February 23, 1938. At the time of the accident there was in existence and in force and effect a policy of workmen’s compensation insurance covering the Pollyanna Trading Corp., namely, policy No. 73625, issued on the 8th day of September, 1937, and continuing to September 8, 1938. The previous year, from September 8, 1936, to September 8, 1937, the same concern had had policy No. 61277 with the same company. In connection with the policy for the former year the claimant had executed an election that the executive officers should not be covered. She had not executed any such election as provided by section 54, subdivision 6, of the Workmen’s Compensation Law in connection with the policy in force at the time of the accident. The employer’s first notice of the accident contained a statement that she was a window trimmer and was engaged in her usual occupation when injured; she received seventy dollars a week. While the policy in force attempted to show that executive officers were not covered, the law required them at the time to cover them unless they had signed an elective notice not to be covered. This the claimant had not done in connection with the policy in force and her waiver to the policy of the previous year cannot be considered to change the provisions of section 54, subdivision 6, of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. (Matter of Leef v. Dainty Kiddie Cap Co., Inc., 251 App. Div. 764; application for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, 275 N. Y. 651.) Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, HefEernan and Sehenek, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
257 A.D. 1093, 14 N.Y.S.2d 679, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-katz-v-pollyanna-trading-corp-nyappdiv-1939.