Claim of Kaplan v. Kaplan Knitting Mills, Inc.

221 A.D. 484, 224 N.Y.S. 262, 1927 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6474
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 23, 1927
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 221 A.D. 484 (Claim of Kaplan v. Kaplan Knitting Mills, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Kaplan v. Kaplan Knitting Mills, Inc., 221 A.D. 484, 224 N.Y.S. 262, 1927 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6474 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1927).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Samuel Kaplan died February 24, 1923, as the result of injuries which he received that day in an elevator, while he was helping to move a machine of the Kaplan Knitting Mills, Inc., of which he was the treasurer.

An award was refused because notice of claim was not filed within the period of one year from his death. As to the widow, the decision must be affirmed. But the infant son did not have a general guardian until September 7, 1923, so that the time did not commence to run against him until that date. (Workmen's Compensation Law, § 115, as amd. by Laws of 1922, chap. 615; Chase v. Ulster & Delaware R. R. Co., 215 App. Div. 581.) Further, notice of election to sue, with a claim for deficiency compensation, dated February. 24, 1924, appears to have been filed March 7, 1924. That notice contains all of the requirements of a notice of claim and was filed within one year from the date of the appointment of the guardian, so that it was in time and the decision of the Industrial Board in the infant’s case should be reversed and his claim should be remitted for hearing.

Cochrane, P. J., Van Kirk, Hinman, McCann and Whitmyer, JJ., concur.

Decision affirmed as to the mother, and decision reversed and claim remitted to the State Industrial Board as to the infant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Claim of Decker v. Pouvailsmith Corp.
225 A.D. 489 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
221 A.D. 484, 224 N.Y.S. 262, 1927 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-kaplan-v-kaplan-knitting-mills-inc-nyappdiv-1927.