Claim of Kantor v. William Armstrong Publishing Co.
This text of 236 A.D. 749 (Claim of Kantor v. William Armstrong Publishing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Assuming that the claimant stepped out of his employment when he went to get a drink of lemonade (Matter of Clark v. Voorhees, 231 N. Y. 14), he was within the course of his employment when ascending the stairway leading to his employer’s premises to perform the duties of his employment by a way provided by the employer. (Ross v. Howieson, 232 N. Y. 604; Matter of Kowalek v. N. Y. Cons. R. R. Co., 229 id. 489.) The award should be affirmed. All concur. McNamee, J., not voting. Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
236 A.D. 749, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-kantor-v-william-armstrong-publishing-co-nyappdiv-1932.