Claim of Kame v. Quarry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Kame v. Quarry

255 A.D. 742, 6 N.Y.S.2d 869, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4975

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 28, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 255 A.D. 742 (Claim of Kame v. Quarry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Kame v. Quarry, 255 A.D. 742, 6 N.Y.S.2d 869, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4975 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an award to claimant for permanent partial loss of use of Ms right hand. Claimant was employed as a laborer by the employer herein in a quarry in Steuben county, where he was feeding stone into a stone crusher; occasionally unexploded dynamite caps and sticks of dynamite would be found in the stone and it was Ms practice to pick them out before they passed through the crusher. On the day in question he was carrying in Ms hand a dynamite cap described as a dud, wMch he had picked out of the stone; it exploded, causing the injury here involved. The Board found that at the time of the accident claimant violated no instructions as to the handling of the dynamite cap, nor was there any proMbition of the work performed by the claimant pertaining to the disposition of the dynamite caps wliich were removed from the stones wMch were put into the crusher; that he was engaged in carrying out and furthering and advancing the interests of his employer, and Ms act in carrying the dynamite caps to the man in charge of the dynamite was so closely affiliated with claimant’s employment that it constituted a natural incident of said employment. The evidence sustains the findings of the Board. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an award to claimant for permanent partial loss of use of Ms right hand. Claimant was employed as a laborer by the employer herein in a quarry in Steuben county, where he was feeding stone into a stone crusher; occasionally unexploded dynamite caps and sticks of dynamite would be found in the stone and it was Ms practice to pick them out before they passed through the crusher. On the day in question he was carrying in Ms hand a dynamite cap described as a dud, wMch he had picked out of the stone; it exploded, causing the injury here involved. The Board found that at the time of the accident claimant violated no instructions as to the handling of the dynamite cap, nor was there any proMbition of the work performed by the claimant pertaining to the disposition of the dynamite caps wliich were removed from the stones wMch were put into the crusher; that he was engaged in carrying out and furthering and advancing the interests of his employer, and Ms act in carrying the dynamite caps to the man in charge of the dynamite was so closely affiliated with claimant’s employment that it constituted a natural incident of said employment. The evidence sustains the findings of the Board. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

255 A.D. 742, 6 N.Y.S.2d 869, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4975, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-kame-v-quarry-nyappdiv-1938.