Claim of Kalevas v. J. H. Williams & Co.
231 N.E.2d 290, 20 N.Y.2d 812, 284 N.Y.S.2d 704, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1182
This text of 231 N.E.2d 290 (Claim of Kalevas v. J. H. Williams & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Claim of Kalevas v. J. H. Williams & Co., 231 N.E.2d 290, 20 N.Y.2d 812, 284 N.Y.S.2d 704, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1182 (N.Y. 1967).
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs to respondent Workmen's Compensation Board; no opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Keating and Breitel. Judge Van Voorhis dissents and votes to reverse and to dismiss the claim upon the authority of Matter of Jordan v. Decorative Co. (230 N. Y. 522).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Claim of Pepe v. City & Suburban
29 A.D.3d 1184 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Bender v. Deflon Anderson Corporation
298 A.2d 346 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1972)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
231 N.E.2d 290, 20 N.Y.2d 812, 284 N.Y.S.2d 704, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-kalevas-v-j-h-williams-co-ny-1967.