Claim of Kalevas v. J. H. Williams & Co.

231 N.E.2d 290, 20 N.Y.2d 812, 284 N.Y.S.2d 704, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1182
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 24, 1967·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs to respondent Workmen's Compensation Board; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Keating and Breitel. Judge Van Voorhis dissents and votes to reverse and to dismiss the claim upon the authority of Matter of Jordan v. Decorative Co. (230 N. Y. 522).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claim of Kalevas v. J. H. Williams & Co., 231 N.E.2d 290, 20 N.Y.2d 812, 284 N.Y.S.2d 704, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1182 (N.Y. 1967).

231 N.E.2d 290 (Claim of Kalevas v. J. H. Williams & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Claim of Pepe v. City & Suburban
29 A.D.3d 1184 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Bender v. Deflon Anderson Corporation
298 A.2d 346 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1972)