Claim of Kadison v. Gottlieb
This text of 226 A.D. 700 (Claim of Kadison v. Gottlieb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In June, 1926, the claimant sustained a fracture of her arm, which injury arose out of and in the course of her employment. In computing the amount of the weekly wage the Industrial Board has calculated her entire earnings during the year immediately preceding her accident, including earnings in other employments. This is not permissible. (Matter of Blatchley v. Dairymen’s League Co-Operative Assn., 225 App. Div. 167.) But tips received and the value of her board may be considered. (Sloat v. Rochester Taxicab Co., 177 App. Div. [701]*70157; Hughes v. Belmont Lunch Company, 212 id. 847.) In determining the weekly wage, Matter of Dingee v. Dairymen’s League Co-Operative Assn. (219 App. Div. 846) is not to be construed to hold that in no wise can compensation for disability be less than eight dollars per week. Section 15, subdivision 6, of the Workmen’s Compensation Law
Since amd. and re-enacted by Laws of 1927, chap. 558.— [Rep.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
226 A.D. 700, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-kadison-v-gottlieb-nyappdiv-1929.