Claim of Joseph v. Sterilek Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Joseph v. Sterilek Co.

260 A.D. 969, 23 N.Y.S.2d 310, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5640

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 13, 1940

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 260 A.D. 969 (Claim of Joseph v. Sterilek Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Joseph v. Sterilek Co., 260 A.D. 969, 23 N.Y.S.2d 310, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5640 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the employer and insurance carrier from an award of death benefits in favor of the dependent mother of an employee who died as the result of accidental injuries sustained in the course of his employment. There is also an appeal taken by the employer alone from a like award made solely against it on ground that decedent was employed in violation of the Labor Law at the time of the accident. (Workmen’s Comp. Law, § 14r-a.) There is evidence that decedent made substantial weekly contributions to the support and maintenance of his mother and the minor members of the family. The finding of dependency is fairly supported by such proof. Decedent was but seventeen years of age at the time of the accident. Concededly no special permit or authority had been given for his employment. At the time of the accident the statute (Labor Law, § 131) provided that no child between the age of sixteen and eighteen years of age should be employed, in connection with a business such as respondent conducted, without a special permit. Although decedent may have been employed prior to the effective date of the statute, nevertheless there was a violation thereof if his employment was continued thereafter while he was under eighteen years of age. Awards unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Heffernan, Schenck and Foster, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the employer and insurance carrier from an award of death benefits in favor of the dependent mother of an employee who died as the result of accidental injuries sustained in the course of his employment. There is also an appeal taken by the employer alone from a like award made solely against it on ground that decedent was employed in violation of the Labor Law at the time of the accident. (Workmen’s Comp. Law, § 14r-a.) There is evidence that decedent made substantial weekly contributions to the support and maintenance of his mother and the minor members of the family. The finding of dependency is fairly supported by such proof. Decedent was but seventeen years of age at the time of the accident. Concededly no special permit or authority had been given for his employment. At the time of the accident the statute (Labor Law, § 131) provided that no child between the age of sixteen and eighteen years of age should be employed, in connection with a business such as respondent conducted, without a special permit. Although decedent may have been employed prior to the effective date of the statute, nevertheless there was a violation thereof if his employment was continued thereafter while he was under eighteen years of age. Awards unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Heffernan, Schenck and Foster, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

260 A.D. 969, 23 N.Y.S.2d 310, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5640, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-joseph-v-sterilek-co-nyappdiv-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack